Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: fossil implementation difficulty Date: Sat Apr 17 2021 08:31 am
From: MRO To: xbit

  Re: fossil implementation difficulty
  By: xbit to All on Fri Apr 16 2021 06:56 am

 > Kinda an off the wall question with out much context. But given that what
 > would the degree of difficulty be to implement fossil capabilities into a
 > non-fossil BBS program. Like, say. Spitfire BBS.

 > ^ if you had to guess. Again, I know w/ out seeing the SC one would really
 > not know 100%.

 > Spitfire was program written in Borland's Turbo Pascal and interfaced
 > with assembler code compiled by Borland's Turbo Assembler.

i suppose you could use netfoss?
---
 ■ Synchronet ■ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: fossil implementation difficulty (xbit)