-=> Moondog wrote to Gamgee <=-
> I carried a regular Shield 9 for a long while and about a year ago got
> the Plus model. There is virtually no difference in physical
> dimensions, just a very small bit wider on the grip, not really
> noticeable at all. The Plus has a much more textured grip surface, it's
> almost like sandpaper, which results in a solid/firm hold on it. The
> increased magazine capacity is a huge bonus and gives peace of mind. I
> highly recommend it. I've always thought a .40 cal in a handgun this
> small is on the borderline of too "snappy" for effective follow-up
> shots. With today's modern ammo, 9mm is perfectly adequate. The Plus
> fits and works fine with all existing holsters made for the original
> Shield.
Mo> I've read the frames are very similar in size between the 9 and
Mo> 40 M&P;s and t he 40 can accep the 9mm barrel and mags. I'm
Mo> considering getting a 9mm barrel for lighter practicing loads
A quick Google search shows mixed answers/results on that question.
Personally I would never do such a thing. For one reason, the point of
aim would be different because of the different ballistics. Doesn't
really make any sense. If you can't practice with a .40, why carry a
.40? If it's too heavy of a cartridge for you, sell it and buy a 9.
... Nothing is so smiple that it can't get screwed up.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
|
