> > Maybe they didn't like the later, psychedelic stuff the Beatles did but my
> > understanding is that they were up in arms about them long before then.
> Pretty much from day one, mostly because they all had long hair (Elvis, their
> hero, always had short/nbet hair, & no facial hair, so what was with the got
> tam Beatles? These people still say the Beatles began the erosion of
American
> moral values upon arrival in 1964.
Except not everyone liked him, either. He shook his hips too much. :)
> Turned out that correlation does not equal causation; after a proper
> scientific(following the proper rules for such) study, it was determined that
> the type of woman who used the BCP were also the same type to sunbathe in
> bikinis more than the general, perhaps more priggish, population.
I thought I knew where that was going, and I did. :)
> A comment from a senior member on talkclassical.com said:
> "Almost everything he did was unexpected -- and still is on first listen if
> you're deeply immersed in it. It's those passages where he leads you along
and
> you think he's going to resolve a phrase on the tonic or root chord as most
> others composers of the time did, but then goes off on a completely
surprising
> tangent. Combine that with the headbanging thrust, Thrust, THRUST of his
> sforzando passages and he must have had people fainting in the aisles."
Did they give you a name? :)
* SLMR 2.1a * The girl of your dreams is unavailable except in print
--- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
|
