Re: Re: Breaking News
By: Dumas Walker to MOONDOG on Mon Aug 23 2021 05:05 pm
> > The other day I heard there were over 20,000 gun laws at the state level.
> > Instead fo creating new laws, I would advise they look at the exsiting law
> > that are not working towards making people safe rather than create new law
> > that hurt legal gun owners.
>
> Yes, but apparently it is easier for legislature critters to pass new laws
> rather than determine whether or not some law they already passed actually
> works. :(
>
> > The Second exists as part of our given right to
> > defend ourselves, and that's where it hurts me to hear folks who only beli
> > it was there because the founding fathers liked shooting squirrels or
> > punching holes in targets.
>
> Just because someone points out hunting doesn't mean that is the only
> reason they believe in 2A. Jumping on them for mention hunting is just as
> short-sighted as those who think 2A is out-dated.
>
>
> * SLMR 2.1a * A part of the 57% that -didn't- vote for Clinton. Twice.
>
To be clear, I don't jump on the hunting crowd. The few I do debate with are
those who do not believe there's any other reason why someone should own
firearms. I remind them the last time the US considered strict legislation
toward everything except a few simple hunting rifles and shotguns, they were
following the success the Germans were having in the 1930's. When
registration become confiscation, a single shot goose gun is just as menacing
to the eyes of an oppressor.
---
■ Synchronet ■ The Cave BBS - Since 1992 - cavebbs.homeip.net
|