Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: movies as $ failures, but still good! Date: Sun Nov 29 2020 07:56 pm
From: August Abolins To: Al

 A> 118.fido-movies@1:153/757.2 2428fcd6
 A>  Re: movies as $ failures, but still good!
 A>  By: August Abolins to All on Sun Nov 29 2020 06:16 pm

 A> AA> Has anyone here enjoyed a film that was deemed a financial failure at 
the
 A> AA> box-office? EYE OF THE BEHOLDER (1999) was one such film - but I 
thought
 A> AA> it was rather well done in a dark, psycho twisted kind of way. An
 A> AA> investigator is tasked to track down a serial killer and tends to 
protect
 A> AA> the killer from being discovered.

 A> Outland (1981) was a flop I think, but I liked it.

 A> Another more recent flop that I liked was Surrogates.

 A> I don't think they were disasters but they didn't do well.

 A> Ttyl :-),
 A>         Al

 A> ... Computer Hacker wanted. Must have own axe.

I am going to give Outland a try. I missed that one (primarily because I was
still in university and didn't pay attention to films in theatre very much).
But I like Sean Connery - and in this film - he actually wanted the role.

Surrugates sounds interesting too. Bruce Willis brings some good fun in most of 
his films. A couple of oldies of his - which also seemed to be box-office bombs 
- are Hudson Hawk and Last Man Standing.  The first is a comedy/action flick.
The latter is a classy dark film noire kind of thing - the ending is superb.


--- tg BBS v0.6.2
 * Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS by Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/58)

Previous Message       Next Message