Philthy74 wrote to MRO:
> >> Only there is no evidence of any major side effects that have higher
> >> frequencies
> >> than many other drugs. Sure, it was fast tracked by like 3 years, but
> >> they d test like 44,000 subjects or something like that.
Arelor wrote to Philthy74:
> Ar> The problem is not the number of test subjects, but the time spans.
> Ar> See, if I deploy a drug that causes you to grow a second head the 36th
> Ar> month after administration, half a million test subjects won't discover
> Ar> the issue if the test's time span is shorter than 36 months.
MRO wrote:
> they dont even know if this will cause birth defects or cancer in people
> that got the shot. not enough time has passed.
The last comment is a good point! The rollout is to the "vulnerable" seniors
first, and if they die (from anything) ..well, they were old anyway, right? :/
Or if they die of other naturaly causes, any damaging effect of the drug will
not be known.
If the goal is to have 50% of the population immunized with that stuff before
there is a sense that the virus is under control, I would rather prefer to be
in the OTHER 50%.
---
■ Synchronet ■ The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada
|
