Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: $F+ compiler flag. Date: Sat Jul 02 2016 02:46 am
From: Joseph Larsen To: mark lewis

ml> is there an explicit problem with your test builds that relies on FAR (


I don't know why my quotation doesn't work. But, anyway. Here are the
commands I compile the source with:

ppc386 -FWwpo1.wpo -Mtp -OWall -CX -XX -Xs- -al -Tlinux imp
ppc386 -FWwpo2.wpo -Mtp -OWall -Fwwpo1.wpo -Owall -CX -XX -Xs- -al -Tlinux imp

ppc386 -Fwwpo2.wpo -Mtp -Owall -CX -XX -al -Tlinux imp

As you can see, the "-Mtp" is at every iteration of the compiler command(s).
Doing things this way, decrease the binary by about 300KiB.  I know I should
probably use the IDE, but I don't.

What i'm thinking, maybe i'm wrong, is that the $F directive will solve some
problems i'm having with the code. Like the garbled message headers for example.
And, hopefully, the allowance of replying to messages. Maybe this is far
fetched, I don't know. But i'm crossing my fingers.

Thanks,

|09ignatius |07(|15cia|07)

--- DayDream BBS/UNIX (Linux) 2.15a
 * Origin: catch22bbs.com >>>  >> > (1:340/800)

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: $F+ compiler flag. (mark lewis)
Replies: $F+ compiler flag. (mark lewis)