Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: Re: Dupes? Date: Tue Oct 12 2021 01:43 pm
From: g00r00 To: Jay Harris

 JH> Here are two more than came through today.  I've turned off my feeds to
 JH> 2:221/6 & 3:770/1 for now and am just hooked up to 1:229/426:

 JH> https://paste.ee/p/hBhCR

 JH> https://paste.ee/p/nN9aV

 JH> Again, the kludges look the same (except for the path and seen-by lines)
 JH> but the message body has again been modified.  One message has a SLMR
 JH> line where the other one doesn't.

The short answer to your messages here is: These are not considered duplicate
messages as the message content is different.  But I'll explain a little more
detail for you if you're interested:

Mystic doesn't only rely on MSGID because some software or messages/networks
may not use them at all.  Instead, Mystic takes all things into consideration
in totality which includes: MSGID, actual message content, PATH addresses (to
prevent importing circular distributed messages) and SEEN-BY (to prevent
distributing circular exported packets).

As you noted these messages aren't really duplicates because the message
content is different and Mystic knows this (despite what the MSGID alone says). 
Because it knows they aren't the same, it doesn't treat it as a duplicate.

I can understand why some may think a duplicate MSGID alone would/should be
enough, but legacy software (especially in the art scene where Mystic was
popular) didn't use them at all and other prominent software (like EleBBS I
remember testing, among others) were prone to spitting out two completely
different messages with the same MSGID in the same echo.

As a result of all of that Mystic looks at everything and will not block a
message unless its very confident that it truly is a duplicate message.  In
your case those messages are not duplicates in message content.

... Fer sell cheep: BBS spel chekker. Wurks grate.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/09/23 (Windows/64)
 * Origin: Sector 7 * Mystic WHQ (1:129/215)

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: Re: Dupes? (Jay Harris)
Replies: Re: Dupes? (Jay Harris)