Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: Re: Newbie question Date: Wed Nov 27 2024 09:07 pm
From: deon To: Wilfred van Velzen

  Re: Re: Newbie question
  By: Wilfred van Velzen to deon on Wed Nov 27 2024 09:38 am

Hey Wilfred,

 > It doesn't say that! It says:
 >
 > "Although the Origin line is not required by all Echomail processors, it is
 > added by the Conference Mail System to ensure complete compatibility."
 >
 > It is not very clear wording, but I read that as software that creates
 > echomail messages should always add the origin line. But software that
 > processes echomail, should be flexible when it is not present.

I'm not going to 100% agree with you on this one.

In FTS-0004, in the section about Origin lines (which is point 3), the wording a
s you have quoted "not required by all..." and "added... complete compatibility"
 indicates to me that it is not (absolutely) required, but rather useful if it i
s added.

Further, point 1 (Area Line), and point 4 (Seen-by Lines), explicitly states tha
t these control fields are required. So if point 3 was required, I would expect 
it to explicitly state that too.

Certainly I agree that FSC-0074 does make this clearer and states that they are 
required. It probably should have been promoted to a technical standard, but was
nt, for whatever reasons it never made it?


...δεσ∩

---
 ■ Synchronet ■ AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSI

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: Re: Newbie question (Wilfred van Velzen)
Replies: Re: Newbie question (Wilfred van Velzen)