AA> It seems that mircast is designed for laptops only. I've read that
AA> there are USB dongles for PCs that can "broadcast" video to a matching
AA> receiver at the TV.
AA> When I first learned about Win10's support to cast video to another monitor
AA> on a network, or to a TV with mircast, I was thinking "I could really use
AA> that for entertainment and customer service at
AA> the shop".
AA> Before that, I was poised to rig up a dedicated pc at each TV and use
AA> VNC and cast extended desktop displays to them. But the extra hardware and
AA> wiring seemed ridiculous.
Not sure about the laptop only or not. I did enough research to be able to tell
if my PC was capable of the wireless display feature, and bought it. I
am not a big fan of wireless A/V over wired, however in my case it was a need
and the only way to accomplish it without expensive hubs.
I have wired outdoor speaker planters, to an older Onkyo receiver, and muti-room
switcher. It's connected to an airport express and itunes. Prior
to the airport express it was a 200 disc CD changer. Lets just say that the
wiring was a lot of work to get it from the second floor of my home to the
back yard, and frankly I couldn't hear the difference between
itunes versus the 200 disc changer as the outdoor speakers were a garage sale
find and crap anyway :) Since then I'm more open to wireless tech -- except for
my home theater system.
After owning the Miracast/Microsft WD for a few weeks now, the only minor
annoyance is having to reconnect it (in monitor settings) each time Windows
reboots. Otherwise I've noticed zero difference between it and the HDMI hard
connected display.
-tG
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A45 2020/02/18 (Windows/32)
* Origin: The Underground [@] theunderground.us:10023 <-port (1:227/702)
|
