Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: Trialing FMail/lnx status check-in Date: Fri Sep 08 2017 03:47 pm
From: Nicholas Boel To: Wilfred van Velzen

Hello Wilfred,

On Fri Sep 08 2017 12:22:40, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 WV> The jam file area name that is used on Pauls system is odd, but all is
 WV> working fine...

Ok.

 WV> It did see it and exported the message to Pauls outbound (if that
 WV> isn't clear yet?)...

Very clear. However, the only reason it was scanned out is because his FMail
scanned _every_ area, rather than just what was in the echomail.jam.

 NB>> I believe I had asked about some better logging when echomail.jam
 NB>> fails too. ;)

 WV> It's there... In the debug version. Just have to clean that up a bit
 WV> for the production version. ;)

Did you give Paul a compiled setup with the updated fmail.c you gave me that
fixed linux paths in echomail.jam?

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20170303
 * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: Re: Trialing FMail/lnx status check-in (Wilfred van Velzen)
Replies: Re: Trialing FMail/lnx status check-in (Wilfred van Velzen)