Re: No DOVENET for a few days...
By: deon to Digital Man on Sun Jan 22 2023 01:38 pm
> Re: No DOVENET for a few days...
> By: Digital Man to deon on Sat Jan 21 2023 04:30 pm
>
> Howdy,
>
> > > Any other reason why they were left around?
>
> > Not sure. Perhaps just timeouts (due to issues on the server side) while d
ownloading. Likely there's another issue lingering
> > as
> > to why those 0 byte packets were left around in the first place.
>
> So I suspect it's NAT64, given that you are on IPv6, and FTP. I havent done e
nough research to confirm it.
I don't have an Internet IPv6 address.
> So I thought I'd try and get QWK packets via http and changed qnet-ftp to qne
t-http.
>
> It seems that's not working?
Correct, qnet-http is not supported today. Perhaps in the future.
> Jan 22 13:34:18 d-11-1 synchronet: evnt QNET Call-out: VERT
> Jan 22 13:34:18 d-11-1 synchronet: evnt QNET QNET-HTTP 1.3 invoked with optio
ns: VERT dove.synchro.net xxxxx
> Jan 22 13:34:19 d-11-1 synchronet: evnt QNET Getting /opt/sbbs/data/VERT.qwk
Jan 22 13:34:19 d-11-1 synchronet: evnt QNET GET
> /qwk.ssjs HTTP/1.0 Response: HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
> Jan 22 13:34:19 d-11-1 synchronet: evnt QNET Call-out to: VERT returned 1
>
> I'm guessing that is your side? It should work right?
No, it's purposely disabled on Vert.
--
digital man (rob)
Breaking Bad quote #31:
Feels like one of those cones put on dogs so they don't lick their own balls.
Norco, CA WX: 53.2°F, 45.0% humidity, 0 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
|
