Howdy,
I've noticed that some of my email, coming from an internal spam filter is being
marked as spam:
Aug 24 21:13:05 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0082 SMTP DNSBL Query: 9.5.7.9.9.d.e.f.f
.f.9.2.c.0.2.0.4.9.4.2.4.1.3.0.0.0.4.3.6.0.4.2.sbl.spamhaus.org resolved to: 127
.255.255.254
Aug 24 21:13:05 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0082 SMTP [2406:3400:314:2494:20c:29ff:f
ed9:9759] BLACKLISTED SERVER on sbl.spamhaus.org (see http://www.spamhaus.org/):
<no name> = 127.255.255.254
Aug 24 21:13:06 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0082 SMTPS [2406:3400:314:2494:20c:29ff:
fed9:9759] Receiving mail message from <bt.wubhkdac30=ezymsq56sigp=eh3dkymm2l@em
427968.dlcm.co> to <deon.george@bbs.leenooks.net>
According to spamhaus, 127.255.255.254 is not a confirmation of SPAM (https://ww
w.spamhaus.org/news/article/807/using-our-public-mirrors-check-your-return-codes
-now.) , but rather an indication that the system querying its services do not p
rovide a rDNS. So is there a way to not mark this as spam?
I tried to update the spamblock_exempt.cfg with the relays IPv6 address (..:9759
), but it doesnt seem to make a difference. Does this accept IPv6 addresses?
On a related topic, I tried to enable email forwarding to another email that I r
ead more often, but mail never made it.
Aug 12 21:37:36 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0177 SMTPS [2406:3400:314:2497:f1d0::1]
Forwarding to: <REDACTED1>
Aug 12 21:37:36 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0177 SMTPS [2406:3400:314:2497:f1d0::1]
Receiving mail message from <bt.e2013xrc30=4ns5qw4x12kd=6lyqyydln5@em427968.dlcm
.co> to <deon.george@bbs.leenooks.net>
Aug 12 21:37:36 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0177 SMTPS [2406:3400:314:2497:f1d0::1]
End of message (body: 22 lines, 902 bytes, header: 67 lines, 4136 bytes)
Aug 12 21:37:36 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0177 SMTPS [2406:3400:314:2497:f1d0::1]
End of message (body: 22 lines, 902 bytes, header: 67 lines, 4136 bytes)
Aug 12 21:37:36 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0177 SMTPS [2406:3400:314:2497:f1d0::1]
Executing external mail processor: MailAuth
Aug 12 21:37:36 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0177 SMTPS [2406:3400:314:2497:f1d0::1]
Added message header #4944 from 'Deon George' <REDACTED> to 'deon.george@bbs.lee
nooks.net' <REDACTED1>
Aug 12 21:37:38 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0000 SEND Message #4944 (383 of 383) fro
m 'Deon George' <bt.e2013xrc30=4ns5qw4x12kd=6lyqyydln5@em427968.dlcm.co> to 'deo
n.george@bbs.leenooks.net' <REDACTED1>
Aug 12 21:37:38 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0180 SEND connecting to port 2525 on mai
l.smtp2go.com [173.255.233.87]
Aug 12 21:37:40 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0180 SEND TLS Session started successful
ly
Aug 12 21:37:41 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0180 SEND/TLS !INVALID RESPONSE: '550 ap
p.smtp2go.com.' Expected: '25'
Aug 12 21:37:41 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0180 SEND !Delivery attempt #1 FAILED (m
ail.smtp2go.com replied with: "550 app.smtp2go.com." instead of the expected rep
ly: "25* ...") for message #4944 from Deon George to REDACTED1
Aug 12 21:37:41 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0180 SEND !Bouncing message back to <bt.
e2013xrc30=4ns5qw4x12kd=6lyqyydln5@em427968.dlcm.co>
Aug 12 21:37:41 d-11-1 synchronet: mail 0180 SEND !Delivery failure notification
(message #4945) created for <bt.e2013xrc30=4ns5qw4x12kd=6lyqyydln5@em427968.dlc
m.co>
I assuming the forwarding failed, because the email wasnt actually from bt.e2013
...@...dlcm.co, it was from <REDACTED>
Anyway to fix that?
...δεσ∩
---
■ Synchronet ■ Alterant | an SBBS in Docker on Pi!
|
