Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nelgin to All on Thu May 12 2022 07:47 pm
> On Wed, 11 May 2022 19:44:55 -0700
> "Digital Man" <digital.man@VERT> wrote:
>
>
> > Anything's possible. But EchoCfg is completely optional - it just
> > modifies sbbsecho.ini. You could do that by hand. You don't strictly
> > *need* EchoCfg.
>
> Why not add a modopts.ini option to "include echocfg link in scfg" or
> something so it'll run echocfg from scfg and vice versa. At least you
> wouldn't have to exist the program. It'd be like just another option.
> Maybe that'll get him to STFU and move on. :)
Because that sounds like a hacky mess: modopts.ini is for JavaScript *module* op
tions, not applicable here at all. I don't think The Millionaire is actually run
ning SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make conversation. <shr
ug>
--
digital man (rob)
Breaking Bad quote #31:
Feels like one of those cones put on dogs so they don't lick their own balls.
Norco, CA WX: 76.3°F, 20.0% humidity, 6 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
|