Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: Re: Makenl and bad segments... Date: Fri Jan 02 2015 01:49 pm
From: Benny Pedersen To: Ward Dossche

Hello, Ward Dossche.
On 01/01/15 14.06 you wrote:

 Kv>> Although I applaud that the update is validated, be aware that 
 Kv>> that requires that the update is generated by makenl. Some RC's 
 Kv>> collate their segement by other means and do not provide a valid 
 Kv>> CRC in the first line.
 WD> Running it through ERRFLAGS prior to submitting would take care of 
 WD> that.

my wish for 2015 is to see makenl does not create invalid nodelists, errflags
is good, but that programing should have being added to makenl long time ago

i think if error flags was coded in c then it would have being done when the
code was shown, or if makenl was coded in pascal it would happend aswell very
fast joining

when there is 2 programs there will always be more then one error to fix, if
there was just one program it would be less error

oh well Gordon Ramsey, Jammie Oliver cooks better then i do :)

--
Best regards, Posted using Hotdoged on Android
--- Hotdoged/2.10/Android
 * Origin: lollipop (2:230/38.1)

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: Re: Makenl and bad segments... (Ward Dossche)