Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: Re: New test.. Date: Tue Aug 15 2017 09:37 pm
From: Wilfred van Velzen To: Nicholas Boel

Hi Nicholas,

On 2017-08-15 08:29:27, I wrote to you:

 NB>> Just seems I'm having an issue with echomail.jam now. Golded creates
 NB>> it in the right place, but running "fmail scan" seems to find it, and
 NB>> delete it, but doesn't actually scan out the message. "fmail scan -S"
 NB>> finds the message and scans it out, though. Odd.

 WvV> I never had a problem with it. But you can look inside it with any editor
 WvV> before you run 'fmail scan'. It's just a plain txt file.

 WvV> -S should. That option ignores echomail.jam, and scans every area for
 WvV> unsend messages front to back.

 WvV> Maybe I need to add some more logging? ;)

While I was adding some debug logging to the echomail.jam processing code, I
found a bug. The paths in the echomail.jam file and those for the jam areas in
the config weren't converted to linux paths before comparing them. On my system 
this wasn't a problem because of some script code that runs after I leave
golded-lnx to fix the paths to their dos versions in echomail.jam, because of
my previous hibrid system. A fixed version of fmail.c is in your inbound...

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: Re: New test.. (Wilfred van Velzen)
Replies: New test.. (Nicholas Boel)New test.. (Nicholas Boel)