-=> On 09-22-19 16:06, Moondog wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Mo> The company making the claims would support their quality claims by
Mo> showing loads of graphs depicting frequency reponse and attenutation,
Mo> however Randi said that was immaterial since he wanted a human
Mo> "expert"to tell them apart in a blind test, not an oscilloscope. They
Well, the product is marketed for use by humans, so actual double blind
listening tests makes the most sense.
Mo> may have been better in the ways of materials and manufacturing,
Mo> however the doubt was if their $500 cable was more noticeable than a
Mo> $25 cable. The audio guy I worked with said price was no concern,
Mo> since a guy spending $10k on a set of speakers isn't going to bother
Mo> with nickle and diming over the price of a cable.
Yes, I reckon they would easily sell them. Me? I have too much Scots in my
ancestry. I'm prepared to spend money for quality, but I'd still pay $50-$100
for decent electrical cable (copper is still somewhat expensive) than wasting
$500 on something of dubious benefit.
... A wholesome mind is wasted potential.
--- MultiMail/Win v0.51
■ Synchronet ■ Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au
|
