Re: The Internet that could have been...
By: Nightfox to Skylar on Fri Apr 05 2024 08:27 am
> From what I heard, it sounded like GeOS performed better than Windows at the
> time.
It was (and still is) amazing what GEOS could do on a 1 Mhz 8-bit 6510 machine w
ith 64KB. There were not a lot of applications available. But for WYSIWYG word p
rocessing and page layout, it was sweet.
GeoWorks performed *so* much better on a 286 than Windows 3.0 or 3.1 ever could.
I had high hopes, but it never gained traction.
> I often thought it was a bummer that Windows became the dominant
> computer platform when there were better alternatives available.
Same here. Although I grew up using a Commodore 64 and laughing at the limitatio
ns of a "PC compatible" and the low quality of PC games available at the time. B
y the time I was in high school, many of my (older) geek friends had an Amiga.
Just one of many examples where the better technology fails to capture market sh
are.
> I thought OS/2 was good too..
I bought OS/2 and gave it a try around 1993. I thought it had potential but we h
ad major driver compatility issues. By then I'd been programming for MS-DOS usin
g Turbo Pascal and Turbo C++ for a few years and much preferred staying in DOS w
hen using a "PC".
---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
|
