Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: slightly different format Date: Sat Dec 26 2020 09:53 pm
From: Maurice Kinal To: Carol Shenkenberger

-={ Corrected DateTime for those in the know: 2020-12-26 21:53:58 +0000 }=-

Hey Carol!

 > ... Werig sceal se wi├╛ winde rowe├╛.
 >     Weary shall he be who rows against the wind.

 CS> Hehehe,

Truer words were never spoken even after well over 1000 years have gone by.
Did Anglo-Saxons have fidonet nodes?  If so then I think I give new meaning to
backwards compatibilty.

 CS> here's a little secret.  Anyone can make a proposal.  It just
 CS> doesn't get changed to a 'standard' unless widely in use.

So I've noticed.  What do you think my odds are?  So far I've only heard the
word 'impossible' which is probably what motivated me to take the chance.  Also 
without the election being called I thought I'd give it a shot if for no other
reson than to increase the traffic here, and on that count I think I might have 
outdone even an election here would have on this regard.

And on that note I believe I am a winner.  :-)

Life is good,
Maurice

... Don't cry for me I have vi.
--- GNU bash, version 5.1.0(1)-release (x86_64-motorshed-linux-gnu)
 * Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: slightly different format (Carol Shenkenberger)
Replies: slightly different format (Carol Shenkenberger)