Hi Maurice,
On 2020-11-23 23:19:37, you wrote to me:
MK> @MSGID: 1:153/7001 5fbc4389
MK> @REPLY: 2:280/464 5fbc09bf
MK> @CHRS: UTF-8 4
MK> @UTC_OFFSET: 0000
MK> -={ Corrected datetime: 2020-11-23 19:12:14 +0000 }=-
Those are non standard. And the 'TZUTC: -0800' is missing. Now if there is fido
software that sorts messsages chronologically, it can't do it correctly.
MK> I think I have come up with a routine that corrects the msg datetime
MK> stamp relative to the user's perspective that also compensates for the
MK> corrupted TZUTC offset. The above corrected datetime was generated
MK> from the msg I am replying to. The output's format in
MK> strftime()-speak is "%F %T %z" and can easily be adjusted to the
MK> enduser's preference. I don't believe it would be wise to output it
MK> to a flag given it is to the enduser's configuration rather than
MK> fidonet at large.
MK> What a hassel. Personally I don't see it being worth the effort but
MK> all things considered I believe the above corrected datetime stamp, or
MK> something like it, would be an appropriate replacement for the ftn msg
MK> header's datetime stamp and should have happened roughly 18 years ago.
Bye, Wilfred.
--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
* Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
|
