Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: re: follow-up on: NCs who've updated to MakeNl_NG Date: Wed Jan 23 2013 10:59 pm
From: Marc Lewis To: Ward Dossche

Hello Ward.

<On 23Jan2013 09:30 Ward Dossche (2:292/854) wrote a message to Marc Lewis
regarding re: follow-up on: NCs who've updated to MakeNl_NG >

 WD>  
ML> The julian date extension is the default for ALL diffs and lists.  It, I
ML> don't think, would not show up anywhere in your normal config file - it's
ML> how the segments are normally transmitted after whichever program has
ML> produced them. E.g., Net9000.018 or Net9000.242.  It's the intended
ML> distribution date; that's what MakeNL is looking at in the Master
ML> directory and calculating the file's relative age from that extension.
 WD>  
 WD> I haven't followed this discussion but I don't think it is any of
 WD> makenl's busyness (pun intended) what the relative age of a segment
 WD> is and based upon that accept or reject it.

Precisely.  MakeNL should do specifically what it's "told" to do and not make
those "decisions" of it own accord.
 WD>  
 WD> As a ZC I have to accept that whatever is sent to me by an RC is
 WD> correctly named and CRC'd, and if nothing newer is received then whatever's
 WD> in the master-directory "is" correct, whatever its age.
 WD>  

I'm in much the same position as an RC.  If I don't happen to receive a weekly
update from an NC, I have to presume the previous segment from that system is
correct and valid... within limits of course.

Best regards,
Marc

... Ever stop to think, and forget to start again?
--- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+
 * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Huntsville,AL-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45)

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: re: follow-up on: NCs who've updated to MakeNl_NG (Ward Dossche)
Replies: follow-up on: NCs who've updated to MakeNl_NG (Andrew Leary)