Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: Re: Test Date: Wed Jan 13 2021 02:46 pm
From: Nigel Reed To: Barry Martin

Barry wrote:

> Hi Nigel!

>  >  NR> + 05 Jan 20:43:58 [1098507] call to 454:1/1@ilink
>  >  NR>   05 Jan 20:43:58 [1098507] trying cfbbs.no-ip.com
>  >  NR> [173.61.230.164]:24554... ? 05 Jan 20:43:59 [1098507] connection
>  >  NR> to 454:1/1@ilink failed: Connection refused
>  > I'd refuse to answer at quarter to nine at night too! <bseg>  To me
>  > "connection refused" is a relatively vague error message -- wrong user
>  > name?  wrong password?  wrong port?  Password might look right but has a
>  > space at the end.  Bad command line is a possibility: there are multiple
>  > punctuation characters which look the same to a human but are radically
>  > different to a computer -- I'm thinking single and double quote, double
>  > hyphens will turn into dashes, etc.
>  NR> Connection refused means the other end won't accept my incoming
>  NR> connection for some reason. The service may not be running,
>  NR> blocked by a firewall, routinng issue. Nothing to do with
>  NR> username, it's not got that far.
>  
> Right -- I haven't had too much experience with various communications
> protocols; for the stuff I do manually usually I have one combined
> command line to enter the username, password, IP address and if 
> necessary port.


>  > I tried a quick Google search for "1098507" -- at least ten pages of
>  > hits.  Tried specifying with Synchronet but that got zero hits; so assuming
>  > a different communications transport.
>  NR> That's the child pid of the binkd thread that is calling out. It
>  NR> helps to track the process in the log file when multiple calls
>  NR> are placed at once.
>  
> No wonder I couldn't find anything!

I'm still trying to figure out how I'm able to send replies if I cannot connect.
This is an odd state. Maybe we should continue this via
email/netmail.
--- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux
 * Origin: ILink:End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (454:1/5016)

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: Test (Barry Martin)