> As I tried to tell Michiel, I am not arguing *AGAINST* the progression
> to IPv6. It's just that it's not currently available to me, and I see
> no reason to jump through hoops for it at this time (like using a
> "tunnel"). When it becomes readily available, I'll start using it.
Yes, same here. I can connect with evey node I need to connect with so a tunnel
would only add complexity and I don't need that.
There is a down side to IPv6. There are machines and systems in use that don't
an never will support IPv6. I think that is what is holding up IPv6.
A dual stack of IPv6 and IPv4 will likely be needed for some time.
There are folks who don't have IPv4 now, I don't know what the numbers are but
we really do need to move that way. IPv4's days are numbered.
--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-6
* Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)
|
