-=> Alan Ianson wrote to Dan Clough <=-
> Yes... but the real question there above is what does *IPv6* offer me
> that I don't already have?
AI> I thing that IPv6 gives you that IPv4 does not is that if you
AI> have multiple machines at home each one can answer on the default
AI> port. Every machine can answer on 24554 for example because each
AI> machine has a unique IP.
That is indeed a useful thing.
AI> The above is not something that most people will care about since
AI> most people don't run any services at home or very little but it
AI> is something I look forward too.
Agreed, and same here.
AI> IPv6 is not some bleeding edge technology but the IPv4 space has
AI> been exhausted and we need to make this change, sooner would be
AI> better than later.
As I tried to tell Michiel, I am not arguing *AGAINST* the progression
to IPv6. It's just that it's not currently available to me, and I see
no reason to jump through hoops for it at this time (like using a
"tunnel"). When it becomes readily available, I'll start using it.
I think maybe I'm just "anti-evangelism". I don't like being preached
to about how I should be doing something that doesn't make sense to me.
Michiel is a little too........... preachy, for me.
... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)
|