Ar> For LXC in particular I tend to favor Devuan because it offers a Debian-li
Ar> base - so third party services you bolt on it are likely to run - without
Ar> carrying the bad babbage Debian has been accumulating as of late.
Thank's for that info, I will look into Devuan. I have never heard of that
distro, but looking at their website, seems like worth a try.
Ar> Alpine is good but then it is less compatible with random stuff you might
Ar> Ar> to deploy on it - it has a minoritary libc, for starters, so lots of
Ar>precompiled solutions simply don't run on Alpine as they are.
Yes, I agree. Originally Alpine seemed like was something I was going to switch
all my containers, however it looks with the amount of work needing to get some
projects working may not be worth the time. I might however use Alpine for
simple services like Samba and ssh. All my other containers would mount those
file shares. This allows me only needing to mount to one samba server to
transfer files if need, rather than need to mount multiple samba servers on on
desktop.
Lloyd (neoshock) sysop @ Vintage Pi BBS
vintagepi.asuscomm.com
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Vintage Pi BBS vintagepi.asuscomm.com
|
