-=> Vk3jed wrote to Nightfox <=-
-=> On 02-27-22 22:25, Nightfox wrote to Vk3jed <=-
Vk> NAT != security. You've fallen for the big myth that NAT is somehow
Vk> more secure. All it does is screw up some protocols (FTP anyone?), and
Vk> puts arbitrary limits on incoming traffic (2 BBSs on the same port, NO
Vk> WAY!).
It's in no way a secure model, but I liked my first setup, where I had a
single IP address and a Linux box with 2 network cards. I ran all of my
services on the box directly with iptables running, and NATed the rest of my
lan over the second card.
Easy, less hassle with NAT, and everything worked.
Admittedly, this was in kindler, gentler times.
... No ceremonies are necessary.
--- MultiMail/DOS v0.52
■ Synchronet ■ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.
|
