ml> or perhaps you misunderstood me? bj÷rn's patched makenl (2.51??) already
ml> allowed this years ago when he let it out for everyone to use...
ml> automatically and no config verbs or similar...
Thanks mark, you are absolutely right. If every *C had used my patched
version already from the Y2K change-over, we wouldn't have to debate this issue
now.
And what encoding to use? Who cares? Just let the fucking 128+ characters
pass, and let the users decide how to handle them! If you cannot see them as
they were intended -- big deal. They would at least be more meaningful, than
the present question marks, to many enough users.
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
* Origin: news://felten.yi.org (2:203/2)
|
