On 2016-12-24, mark lewis <mark.lewis@1> wrote:
> On 2016 Dec 23 19:48:34, you wrote to Tony Comandini:
> JK> Btw, this shows everything looking good from my Poll just now to reply
to
> JK> your netmail:
> JK> 161223 19:40 Friends BBS, 24:300/2.0
> JK> 161223 19:40 AKA: 2:250/5.0
> JK> 161223 19:40 AKA: 80:49/7.0
> JK> 161223 19:40 AKA: 21:1/188.1
> JK> 161223 19:40 AKA: 432:1/119.0
> except it isn't reporting the domains assigned to the zones... if everything
> was reported like the above, he likely wouldn't even know there was a problem
> to begin with... however, seeing
> 161223 19:40 Friends BBS, 24:300/2.0@sportnet
> 161223 19:40 AKA: 2:250/5.0@fidonet
> 161223 19:40 AKA: 80:49/7.0@retronet
> 161223 19:40 AKA: 21:1/188.1@fsxnet
> 161223 19:40 AKA: 432:1/119.0@fidonet
> can alert you to something being wrong... my question on this type of display
> by the remote system is what if their zone/domain list doesn't have other
> zones/domains listed? will/can it still show the inbound othernet
zones@domains
> properly or no? in the case of binkd, yes... what about BBBS? why doesn't it
> show the 5D domains?
> )\/(ark
> Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
> Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin'
it
> wrong...
> ... I have seen the evidence. I want DIFFERENT evidence...
> ---
> * Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
Thanks Mark and my apologise for the stupid request...The problem was ^
usually I write by hand everything with vi (I am an old school Guy) and
is ok...this time I added the line using copy/paste and there you
go...the error was that. I found it using nano....
Thanks evrybody Guys and sorry again
Merry Christmas
Tony
--
---slrn (linux) 1.0.2
--- SBBSecho 3.00-Linux
* Origin: Friends BBS, London | bbs1.tonyuk.online:2424 (2:250/4)
|
