Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: Re: Ping Date: Sun Jul 28 2019 01:14 pm
From: Eric Renfro To: Nick Andre

  Re: Re: Ping
  By: Nick Andre to Frank Linhares on Sat Jul 27 2019 06:22 pm

 NA> This echo is supposed to be about Netmail routing, yes. But really...
 NA> routing is freaking simple. Route the *C method. Meaning, go ahead and
 NA> route for your immediate connections, but out-of-net stuff should go
 NA> through the NC/RC/ZC model.

 NA> The reason we had a chart and presumably why I inherited this echo was
 NA> largely due to the fact that with Internet connections, people are getting
 NA> feeds from anyone - thus Netmail routing became a total mess. The last time
 NA> the chart was updated was by Ross Cassell years ago and he gave up
 NA> maintaining it. 

 NA> I very stubbornly believe if everyone follows the *C topology, there would
 NA> be no routing issues at all, and really the NC of a Net should have direct
 NA> connections with his nodes - no matter where those nodes are getting feeds.

Yep. I definitely agree with that. All my nodes in Net135 I have direct connects
with, a majority of them feed directly off me, too, because I run a pretty solid
setup. But, as it is, I make sure all of my connections do indeed at /least/
setup a session specifically for at least Netmail feed from the HUB, and uses
that for routing netmail. Beyond that, they're free to pick up a feed for
echo/files from the HUB or whatever they wish from then on. I've been helping
where needed in new setups to make that happen.

)))[Psi-Jack -//- Decker]
--- SBBSecho 3.08-Linux
 * Origin: Decker's Heaven -//- bbs.deckersheaven.com (1:135/371)

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: Re: Ping (Nick Andre)