Re: Re: Synology DS1010+
By: poindexter FORTRAN to Arelor on Mon Aug 30 2021 07:49 am
> -=> Arelor wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
>
> Ar> That said, I don't like it much when they try to shoehorn 5000
> Ar> functions within an appliance that is supposed to be a file server.
>
> Yeah, but I was trying to shoehorn all of that functionality into my router,
> which definitely wasn't meant for it. :)
>
> For a homelab, this looks like a good solution - RAID in a compact chassis,
> hot-swap drive bays, kernel-mode Linux-based NFS (my router implements NFS
> with a user-mode app, which is slowww...)
>
> This week I'm going to play with trunking to my router to agregate the 2 LAN
> ports on my NAS and integrate NFS into my Proxmox config.
>
>
> ... Do something sudden, destructive and unpredictable
Definitively, I think it is much better if you try to shoehorn LAN
infrastructure into your NAS than trying to shoehorn NFS into your router.
However, if you have a proper Proxmox system I'd rather let it handle all the
proxying and dhcping and dnsing with containers or WMs if you really don't want
to let your router do it.
Using the NAS as an storage server for a Proxmox systems sounds like an
interesting idea. Add more NAS and more Proxmox boxes and you may actually
build a virtualization cluster.
--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
---
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
|
