Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: Z1C Election Date: Thu May 31 2018 06:52 am
From: Phil Kimble To: mark lewis

 ml>  On 2018 May 30 23:47:42, you wrote to All:

 PK>> To date, we have received a total of 16 votes.  Once Mr Riccio 
 PK>> verifies all votes, I will release a current status. ALl netmails have 
 PK>> been replied to with Mr Riccio CC'd for verification. I was hoping to 
 PK>> see more votes but we have time.

 ml> were those replies sent direct or crash or were they sent routed???  direct
 ml> would be the best for security...
They should have been direct crash but probably routed as I only had 1 eye open 
this morning.

 PK>> Please review the Election rules. 2 votes are under review as they 
 PK>> are not listed in the 4 May FidoNet nodelist. It could be that I
 PK>> overlooked them but have double checked & pending verification.

 PK>> As per the election rules established at the beginning of the 
 PK>> election process, this is the official nodelist to be used as 
 PK>> verification. Any vote received that is NOT in the 4 May official 
 PK>> weekly nodelist, not the daily, but the "official" nodelist, will not 
 PK>> be counted.

 ml> that could be a problem... we know there's been a problem with the 
 ml> weekly nodelist dropping entries that are/were in the daily 
 ml> nodelist... i would suggest to use both to ensure that someone that 
 ml> is rightly and properly listed is counted and not skipped because of 
 ml> an error...
 ml> )\/(ark

I fully understand what you are saying & am debating it. However, is it not the 
RC's job to ensure the nodelist is accurate & current for thier Region, same as 
for NCs?  If they are unable to perform that function for a Region, how will
they perform at the Zone level? 

But then again, I dont receive a daily nodelist, P4 doesnt recognize it as an
"official" nodelist, or even a nodelist at all. And the election rules clearly
states which nodelist to use. It is kinda late in the game to be discussing
technical issues about an unofficial nodelist.

But, it is in debate & being re-considered.  

BTW: Can anyone explain why I received a netmail from the Z2C on this very
topic when this is a "Zone 1" election?


Phil

--- Msged/LNX 6.1.2
 * Origin: Bayhaus.net - Colorado Springs - Serving the FrontRange (1:128/2)

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: Z1C Election (mark lewis)
Replies: Z1C Election (mark lewis)