Path:
eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.PO
STED!not-for-mail
From: "BillW50" <BillW50@aol.kom>
Newsgroups:
alt.windows-xp,alt.os.windows-xp,microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment,mi
crosoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Subject: Re: Proposal to Keep WinXP Support "Alive"
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 05:27:13 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <kausmi$pmm$1@dont-email.me>
References: <m36sc8dpovqpibrtvmcd7pvdq2kpu3m5i6@4ax.com>
<XnsA12C3B284ED20jj@88.198.244.100>
<669769ce-c1a1-4f17-90f0-68768fc8dab6@f4g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<kan5mu$rpf$1@dont-email.me>
<XnsA12CD98B5C9BBauricauricauricauric@88.198.244.100>
<mho1d8pttbketmb4d9abm1da1at6hgo0ut@4ax.com>
<XnsA12DA66586A0AVeebleFetzer@216.196.97.142> <kaqs3f$35f$1@dont-email.me>
<kat9ef$iul$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:27:15 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="12e84f8376fd6eae95560dcb922d23ee";
logging-data="26326"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+W/MbgQsttMA+oeXZcIOmf"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 121220-0, 12/20/2012), Outbound message
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/G8wHS6lz+qdu7gOi80BIIXtRBU=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.windows-xp:3973 alt.os.windows-xp:5381
microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment:2432
microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support:30840
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:105994
In news:kat9ef$iul$1@dont-email.me,
HankG typed:
> "Tim Rude" <timrude.nospam@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:kaqs3f$35f$1@dont-email.me...
>> "Bert" <bert@iphouse.com> wrote in message
>> news:XnsA12DA66586A0AVeebleFetzer@216.196.97.142...
>>> In news:mho1d8pttbketmb4d9abm1da1at6hgo0ut@4ax.com "Ken Blake, MVP"
>>> <kblake@kb.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You do *not* have to use the Modern/Metro interface, and if you
>>>> don't, it's hardly distinguishable from Windows 7,
>>>
>>> So, what's the "value add" from Windows 8 for people who use their
>>> PCs for more than children's games?
>>>
>>> --
>>> bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
>>
>> Not much that I can see.
>>
>> It seems to start and shut down a little bit quicker (once you can
>> find the shut down option), and I thought the on-the-fly
>> benchmarking when copying files was kinda neat. But otherwise, meh.
>>
>> The wasted drive space from having all of the duplicated metro
>> cr'apps is a downer. And if you don't run something like Start8 to
>> give you back a sensible desktop and start menu, it's a nightmare.
> I believe that I read that 8 does not contain a compatability mode.
> Not good. I'm still running Office Professional '95 & 97 (all legal,
> by the way). My Word and Excel work just fine in OpenOffice. Tried
> Access, but having difficulty. Since retiring, don't really need it
> anymore.
> HankG
Naw... Windows 8 *does* have compatibility mode. It lists:
Windows 95
Windows 98 / Windows Me
Windows XP (Service Pack 2)
Windows XP (Service Pack 3)
Windows Vista
Windows Vista (Service Pack 1)
Windows Vista (Service Pack 2)
Windows 7
--
Bill
Gateway M465e ('06 era) - OE-QuoteFix v1.19.2
Centrino Core2 Duo T5600 1.83GHz - 4GB - Windows XP SP2
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
* Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)
|
