Ar> > Cmon dude; you think didn't break ALL the laws going into Iraq?
Ar> Waters get a bit muddy here.
LOL - really? How so - what I was trying to say is that I think presidential
immunity IS needed, and WAS given through all of our history - Trump only had to
fight for it being on the books because of what the current POTUS is doing to
him.
And... I think the SCOTUS got it right today with the limited ruling they gave;
I think they got it perfect.
Ar> So basically I think if you don't have the right to steal and lie and
Ar> kill then you cannot designate somebody to steal and lie and kill in
Ar> your name.
And thats pretty much what SCOTUS said today; presidents have immunity when they
are doing things that relate to their position - and not if they kill their
wife. Or politcal opponent. :P
Ar> Democracy was ripping by the seams because half the country didn't Ar>
Ar> respect due procedures, and in any other country this would have resulted
Ar> Ar> in lots of politicians getting jailed for insubordination or rebellion.
And still are.... but I think we're on the same page here. I don't know how Jan
6th was even CLOSE to being on the level of the prior years 'protests of love' -
what a j0ke.
|07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
|08.........
|
