Section One BBS

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: OpenDoors Date: Thu Dec 02 2021 02:51 pm
From: The Lizard Master To: Digital Man

  Re: OpenDoors
  By: Digital Man to The Lizard Master on Thu Dec 02 2021 11:04 am

 > OpenDoors could likely build for Windows-x64 with very few changes, if any.
 > But what would be the gain? 32-bit doors run just fine on 64-bit versions of
 > Windows. <shrug> There might be some imperceptable performance improvement,
 > but practically speaking, I can't think of a reason a sysop would need Win64
 > doors instead of Win32.

Well, and this is absurd, but I was using Qbasic64 and including OpenDoors which
 appeared that it would work perfectly.  Qbasic64 is 64bit only though and so it
 choked on compile both just using the .DLL (which makes sense) and the full rec
ompile of OpenDoors.

In Visual Studio I can compile to x64 (compiles fine, but doesn't execute becaus
e it's x32), but when I target x32 I get unresolved external symbols.  It's not 
worth the effort for either of these projects, but it is why I asked.  Thanks!

---TLM

---
 ■ Synchronet ■ Nite Eyes BBS - To make people happy about my tagline everywhere
...

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: OpenDoors (Digital Man)
Replies: OpenDoors (The Lizard Master)