Hello Kees,
On Thursday November 03 2016 22:30, you wrote to Andrew Leary:
KE>>> I have had a "look" at 3.4.6, not tested it jet. What I
KE>>> gathered from the docomentation and the source code, is that a
KE>>> BOM from submitted fts5 lines will be removed, but the
KE>>> copyright, prolog and epilog are untouched. Shouldn't the BOM be
KE>>> removed from these files as well?
AL>> Good point. I'll have to add scanning for BOMs in those files as
AL>> well.
Indeed, good point, never thought of testing the prolog/epilog..
KE> There were no problems there. The REMoveBOM flag was enabled, but ofcourse
KE> there were no BOM's in the input files. I will leave the
KE> creation of files with BOM markers to Michiel.
See boms.zip in your inbound.
KE> He uses a MS-editor, that adds such usefull information.
Not really. The editor I normally use does not add boms. I had to revert to
some trickery to add boms for testing.
Cheers, Michiel
--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111
* Origin: http://www.vlist.eu (2:280/5555)
|
