Hello Nightfox!
** On Wednesday 15.09.21 - 08:33, Nightfox wrote to Ogg:
Og>> laser turntable been around? I had no idea that this was
Og>> getting explored back in the 80s.[...]
N> I don't know how long this has been around. I think I
N> first came across that laser turntable maybe 8 years ago..
N> Interesting if it was being explored in the 80s. I'd think
N> the price would be less than it is if that were the case.
According to the article the first models were about $35K.
Now, they are $10K; that's a pretty good reduction! LOL
Og>> I was positioning myself to digitize my LP collection a few
Og>> years ago, but when Spotify came along, [...]
N> The advantage is it's your own copy of the music. I don't
N> like to rely on streaming services all the time..
Spotify offers a download option. Then, it's not required to
rely on an internet connection at all.
What's the point of recording and filing the tracks of an LP
when I can get exactly the same thing from Spotify in download
mode?
N> Also, storage is cheap. I'd probably prefer to have a CD
N> version though. I ripped my whole CD collection in 2009,
N> and I sometimes still buy music on CD and rip it on my PC.
Storage is indeed cheap. I'll still seek out an occassional
actual CD too.
Og>> The 1st generation CD players did a horrible job with CDs
Og>> when they first came out.
N> I imagine that may be why some people think vinyl sounds
N> better.
That's part of it. The early products had a two-fold problem:
the DACs in earlier models were poor, and the mastering of CDs
was not well done.
This article is a good read and explains some issues that even
persist to this day:
http://www.audiodrom.net/en/as-we-see-it-tips-thoughts/65-road-
to-hell
Og>> No need to buy the laser turntable just yet. Audition one
Og>> if/when you get a chance. The cost of LPs is crazy at
Og>> $20+
N> I'm not sure where I'd be able to borrow one. I haven't
N> seen any in my area.
Not borrow. I mean, go to a facility or audio shop that has
demo rooms. But even at $10K per player, I doubt that any
independent shop would bother to get one.
Og>> Further into the wiki article above: "A similar technology is
Og>> to scan or photograph the grooves of the record, and then
Og>> reconstruct the sound [...]
N> I've heard of that being done too. I think it would be
N> interesting to have a music collection in the form of
N> photos (as PNGs or JPGs) rather than audio files. I wonder
N> if you could even save some drive space that way.. I
N> wonder if a photo of a vinyl album would be smaller than
N> individual FLAC or MP3 files for the same album.
I wonder about the data-sizes with the photo approach too.
The key here is to extract the data established by the vinyl
grooves and store it in digital format for repeat listens. But
the designers of those players aren't thinking of that for the
player; they are wanting to replicate the real-time play of the
vinyl, at each and every play.
--- OpenXP 5.0.50
* Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
■ Synchronet ■ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
|
