Re: C is the most efficient p
By: Boraxman to Digital Man on Wed Dec 29 2021 03:30 pm
Bo> Exactly, which is why I don't consider a language, because there isn't
Bo> actually a standard to construct a language. Each author of an assembler
Bo> can make up whatever they like. FASM is a language. MASM is a language,
Bo> AT&T Intel is a language, NASM is a language, etc etc
I see what you mean about assembler. But I'd think you could also argue that ea
ch processor's assembler is its own language, even though there is no standard f
or assembler.
Nightfox
---
■ Synchronet ■ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
|
